Date: July 27, 2024

Revanth Reddy accuses BRS for misleading on Agri Pumpset Meters

Revanth Reddy’s Allegations Against BRS Government

Chief Minister Revanth Reddy accuses the BRS government of misleading the public about installing meters on agriculture pumpsets. He claims the BRS government signed a tripartite agreement with the Centre and Discoms on January 4, 2017. This agreement required the state to install the meters by June 30, 2017. It also mandated smart meters in all houses by December 31, 2018.

Tripartite Agreement and its Implications

During a budget discussion, BRS MLA T Harish Rao asserted that the BRS government had not agreed to the Centre’s pressure to install meters on agriculture pumpsets. This, he said, led to a denial of Rs.30,000 crore over five years. Revanth Reddy responded by placing a copy of the tripartite agreement in the House. He urged Harish Rao to review it, claiming the BRS government had indeed agreed to the Centre’s conditions.

Request for Removal of False Claims

Revanth Reddy requested the Speaker to remove Harish Rao’s statements about the meter installation from the assembly records. He labeled them as false and misleading. He argued that Harish Rao’s comments were an attempt to deceive the House and the public. The tripartite agreement, he said, proves the BRS government’s commitment to fixing meters on agriculture pumpsets.

Historical Context of the Agreement

The Chief Minister emphasized that the BRS government’s agreement with the Centre was a significant decision taken in 2017. The agreement covered not only the installation of meters on agriculture pumpsets but also fixing meters to feeders. It included implementing smart meters across the state by the end of 2018. Revanth Reddy’s allegations challenge the BRS government’s narrative. He suggests their actions were premeditated and not merely responses to external pressures.

Public Reaction and Political Ramifications

Revanth Reddy’s statements have sparked a debate about the BRS government’s transparency and accountability. The accusations suggest a deliberate attempt by the BRS to obscure their compliance with the Centre’s directives. This controversy has significant political implications. It could influence public perception and future policy discussions in the state assembly.

Conclusion

Revanth Reddy’s allegations against the BRS government highlight a critical issue of transparency and accountability in governance. By bringing the tripartite agreement to light, he challenges the BRS’s claims. He calls for a closer examination of their actions regarding the installation of meters on agriculture pumpsets. This debate underscores the need for honest communication between the government and the public. Policies and agreements must be implemented transparently.