Date: October 15, 2024
Pawan Kalyan Faces Case Over Tirumala Laddu Comments
Pawan Kalyan’s Controversial Tirumala Laddu Comments Lead to Legal Trouble
The ongoing Tirumala laddu comments involving Pawan Kalyan took a legal turn. The AP Deputy CM is now facing a case in Hyderabad, which stems from his remarks about the sacred laddu’s purity.
Case Filed by Hyderabad Petitioner
A petitioner in Hyderabad filed the case, accusing Pawan Kalyan of making false claims. The petitioner alleges that Pawan said animal fat was mixed into the Tirumala laddu. The petitioner claims that Pawan made these remarks without any solid proof, which offended the religious sentiments of Tirumala devotees.
According to the petitioner, these comments have hurt the religious sentiments of Tirumala devotees, and a legal complaint was lodged, demanding action against Pawan Kalyan. The petitioner further requested a gag order to prevent the circulation of videos on social media where Pawan made the said comments.
Gag Order Requested Against Pawan
The petitioner also asked the Telangana Chief Secretary to restrict videos circulating on social media, where Pawan Kalyan made these comments. They demanded legal action, stating that such statements could harm the reputation of the Tirumala Temple and mislead the public.
Supreme Court Investigation Already in Progress
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is overseeing a CBI-led investigation into the Tirumala laddu’s composition. This investigation was ordered after similar concerns were raised. Given that the Supreme Court is already handling the case, it’s unclear whether the lower courts will take any immediate action.
By providing opportunities for skill development and technology innovation, this hub will ensure that Ratan Tata’s legacy continues to thrive.
Pawan Kalyan’s Legal Challenges on Thirumala laddu Comments
As the controversy grows, Pawan Kalyan faces mounting legal issues. His remarks on the Tirumala laddu have sparked widespread debate. This case may complicate things further for the Janasena leader, despite the Supreme Court’s investigation being the main focus.